Aviva Directory » Faith & Spirituality » World Religions » Abrahamic Religions » Christianity » Church Divisions » Protestant » Denominations » New Paradigm » House Church Movement

A house church is an umbrella term used to describe a group of Christians who regularly gather for worship in private homes.

Often, new Christian fellowships will meet in homes because the membership is small and homes are the most appropriate place to assemble until the funds are available for a dedicated place of worship. Many established churches, from various denominations, met in homes in their early years.

However, this part of our web guide is not focused on denominational groups temporarily meeting in homes, as these are more appropriately categorized within their respective denominations. This category is focused on what is often known as the house church movement.

The house church movement was sparked by spiritual awakenings within Christian communities, combined with a renewed interest in grassroots movements and more intimate gatherings.

The house church movement emerged from waves of spiritual awakening within Christian communities seeking grassroots renewal. Driven by a desire for more intimate gatherings, it strives to recapture the simplicity of Early Christian fellowship and is sometimes referred to as the simple church. This movement challenges institutional structures in favor of home-based assemblies characterized by shared leadership and participatory worship.

From its inception, Christianity met in homes rather than in dedicated buildings. Biblically, the "church" refers to the body of believers rather than the place they meet. New Testament authors reference assemblies in private residences, including the gatherings at Priscilla and Aquila's house (1 Cor 16:19; Rom 16:5), Nympha's house (Col 4:15), and Philemon's home (Philem 1:2). Acts also records the disciples meeting in the Upper Room after Pentecost (Acts 1:13). Additionally, archaeological finds, such as the 3rd-century Dura-Europos house church, attest to domus ecclesiae serving as worship centers under persecution. Early church fathers, like Clement of Alexandria, describe worship within homes, further attesting to a historical pattern of small-group gatherings.

The modern house church movement took shape in the 1960s and 1970s, particularly among evangelicals who were disillusioned with institutional church structures. Some trace the roots of the movement in the United States and the United Kingdom to the Plymouth Brethren, whose emphasis on simplicity and lay leadership resonated with house church pioneers. Concurrently, Anglican vicar Ernest Southcott advocated bringing the church into homes in his 1950s book, "The Parish Comes Alive," inspiring similar movements across denominations. The Jesus Movement and Charismatic Renewal further advanced the trend, giving birth to networks that favor organic community over formal liturgy.

Spiritual revivals have repeatedly reignited interest in home-based gatherings, emphasizing personal connection over programmatic worship. In China, underground house churches flourished under governmental restrictions, demonstrating resilience and adaptability despite surveillance and prohibitions.

In Western contexts, emerging church leaders, like Francis Chan, have championed simple churches, encouraging believers to forsake large auditoriums for relational intimacy.

The house church movement is non-denominational and extends across Christian traditions (Anabaptist, Baptist, Charismatic, Pietist), manifesting ecumenical networking and charismatic practices within diverse doctrinal frameworks.

House churches exhibit varied models, yet share some core practices. House churches are characterized by participatory worship, with every member encouraged to lead singing, teaching, or prayer. There is generally a shared leadership, although many adopt a fivefold ministry (apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, teachers) drawn from Ephesians 4:11-13. There is a discipleship focus, with small groups facilitating mentoring and accountability. Meeting venues are flexible, rotating between various members' homes to spread the burden of hospitality and to maintain organic growth.

Despite their appeal, the movement faces scrutiny on several fronts, particularly from within the established denominations. Critics warn that decentralized structures can foster doctrinal drift without formal oversight (theological consistency). The absence of trained clergy raises concerns about potential misuse of authority or uneven teaching quality (leadership accountability. Some congregations risk social insulation, neglecting broader community engagement and mission work (inward focus). There is also a question of whether the house church movement can sustain critical distinctiveness or will simply integrate back into mainstream denominations once the membership grows (longevity as a distinct movement).

Nevertheless, the movement represents a compelling return to Early Christian patterns of fellowship, discipleship, and worship.

 

 

Recommended Resources


Search for House Church Movement on Google or Bing